An ever riskier world economy - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
专栏 全球经济

An ever riskier world economy

Trump’s tariff war brings with it unpredictability and a consequent loss of confidence
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":6.06,"text":"We are living in the early stages of a revolution — the attempted conversion of the American republic into an arbitrary dictatorship. Whether Donald Trump will succeed in this attempt is, as yet, unclear. But what he wants to do seems self-evident. His way of governing — lawless, unpredictable, anti-intellectual, nationalist — will have the greatest impact on the US itself. But it is, inevitably, having a huge impact on the rest of the world, too, given the hegemonic role of the US since the second world war. No other country or group of countries can — or wants — to take its place. This revolution threatens chaos."}],[{"start":55.64,"text":"It is far too early to know what the full consequences will be. But it is not too early to make informed guesses on some aspects, notably the unpredictability and consequent loss of confidence being created by Trump’s tariff war. This loss of confidence was the theme of a podcast I did recently with Paul Krugman. Without predictable policies, a market economy cannot function well. If the uncertainty comes from the hegemon, the world economy as a whole will not function well either."}],[{"start":91.66,"text":"In its latest Global Economic Prospects, the World Bank has analysed just this. Its conclusions are inevitably provisional, but the direction of travel must be correct. It starts from the assumption that the tariffs in place in late May will remain over its forecast horizon. This might be too optimistic or too pessimistic. Nobody, perhaps not even Trump, knows. “In this context”, it judges, “global growth is projected to slow markedly to 2.3 per cent in 2025 [0.4 percentage points below the January 2025 forecast]— the slowest pace since 2008, aside from two years of outright global recession in 2009 and 2020. Over 2026-27, a pick-up in domestic demand is expected to lift global growth to a still subdued 2.5 per cent — far below the pre-pandemic decadal average of 3.1 per cent.”"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":157.2,"text":"All this is bad enough. But risks seem overwhelmingly to the downside. Thus, the uncertainty created by Trump’s trade war could lead to far greater declines in trade and investment than projected. Certainly, it will be hard to trust in any supposed “deals” now announced. Again, lower growth will increase social, political and fiscal fragility, so raising perceptions of risk in markets. This might create a doom-loop, with higher costs of finance increasing risk and lowering growth. Weak borrowers, private and public, might be driven into default. Shocks from natural disasters or conflict would then be even more economically damaging."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":205.66,"text":"Upsides can be imagined. New trade deals might be reached, in which many might, courageously, trust. AI-fairy-dust might cause a surge in global productivity and investment. Also, everything might just calm down. A difficulty for this is that today’s Trump shock comes after almost two decades of shocks: global and Eurozone financial crises; pandemic; post-pandemic inflation; and Ukraine-Russia war. Animal spirits must have been impaired."}],[{"start":239.66,"text":"Alas, as Indermit Gill, World Bank chief economist, stresses in his foreword, “the poorest countries will suffer the most”. “By 2027, the per capita GDP of high-income economies will be roughly where it had been expected to be before the Covid-19 pandemic. But developing economies would be worse off, with per capita GDP levels 6 per cent lower.” With the exception of China, it might take two decades for these countries to recoup their losses of the 2020s."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":274.04,"text":"This is not just a result of recent shocks. Thus, “Growth in developing economies has been ratcheting downward for three decades in a row — from an average of 5.9 per cent in the 2000s, to 5.1 per cent in the 2010s to 3.7 per cent in the 2020s.” This tracks the declining growth of world trade, from an average of 5.1 per cent in the 2000s to 4.6 per cent in the 2010s to 2.6 per cent in the 2020s. Meanwhile, debt is piling up. In the long run, it will not help that Trump insists climate change is a myth, too."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":316.48,"text":"So, what is to be done? First, liberalise trade. While developing countries have liberalised substantially in recent years, most of them still have far higher tariffs than high-income economies. Targeted infant-industry promotion can work. But if a country has little international leverage, the best policy remains one of free trade, coupled with the best possible policies for attracting investment, improving human capital and preserving economic stability. In a bad environment, as now, this is even more important than in a benign one."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":353.78,"text":"The choices for bigger powers — China, the EU, Japan, India, the UK and others — are more complex. First, they, too, need to improve their own policies to the greatest possible extent. They also need to co-operate in trying to sustain global rules among themselves, not least on trade. Some powers need to recognise that global imbalances are indeed a significant issue, though they are not about trade policy but rather global macroeconomic imbalances."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":389.62,"text":"This is far from all. As the US retreats from its historic role, others are having greatness thrust upon them. Continued progress on addressing the challenges of climate change and economic development depends on these powers. A better way to resolve excessive debts is necessary, for example. That requires going against today’s trend towards ever greater suspicion of one another."}],[{"start":415.42,"text":"It is possible — even likely — that we are witnessing the withering away of a great effort to promote a more prosperous and co-operative world. Some people will say that such an ending would just signal healthy “realism”. But it would be a folly: we share one planet; and so our destinies are intertwined. Modern technology has made this inescapable. We are at a turning point: we must choose wisely."}],[{"start":448.82,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1749634747_4308.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

我们是否正处于核复兴的边缘?

为什么小型核电站会对可再生能源构成巨大威胁?

内塔尼亚胡与伊朗的战争:“对他来说,这是私人恩怨”

在哈马斯于10月7日发动袭击后,这位以色列总理的政治生涯似乎已经走到尽头。但如今,他正推动着一场自己多年来一直主张的冲突。

玛格丽特•米切尔:通用人工智能不过是“氛围和蛇油”

人工智能伦理领域的先驱之一解释了为何人类需求应成为科技发展的核心驱动力。

谁能在伊朗问题上影响特朗普?

从JD•万斯到“猩猩”,MAGA忠诚支持者和军方领导人正争夺在椭圆形办公室的影响力。

为什么华尔街害怕一个33岁的政治局外人

进步派候选人佐赫兰•马姆达尼搅动了纽约市长选举,城市精英们想要阻止他。

以色列空袭伊朗伊斯法罕核设施,特朗普权衡是否介入战争

美国总统认为欧洲领导的停火谈判无效。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×