The EU needs the courage to imagine a different digital economy | 欧盟需要有勇气去想象一种不同的数字经济 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

The EU needs the courage to imagine a different digital economy
欧盟需要有勇气去想象一种不同的数字经济

Trump’s tech oligarchs are afraid of Europe’s regulatory power — as they should be
特朗普的科技巨头们害怕欧洲的监管权力——他们确实应该如此。
00:00

In the turmoil unleashed by Donald Trump’s return to power, Europeans should not lose sight of one striking feature of the tech oligarchs surrounding him: their naked demand that he gets the EU off their backs. However flattering — unlike many Europeans, they see the EU as a force to reckon with — this is also dangerous. Europe worries about being uncompetitive; it should worry about being subordinated.

The task for all Europeans as they gather at the Paris artificial intelligence summit this week, and in their approach to the digital economy in general, is not to bring a knife to a gunfight. Two instincts that come naturally to European politicians should be avoided: a desire to avoid an economic war with the US as much as possible, in the vain hope of staying close to the status quo ante; and a desire to have what the US has, attempting to copy the particulars of its digital success rather than build what is best for Europe.

Doing the latter requires the courage to imagine a different digital economy than the one now on offer, and the resolve to do what it takes to achieve it.

In Davos last month, Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez set an example when he accused social media companies of concentrating power and wealth in the hands of a few “at the expense of our social cohesion, our mental health and our democracies”. Call it Europe’s fentanyl: a social, health and civic crisis that must be addressed.

It is also a security crisis. Elon Musk has built businesses in satellite communication, connected cars, social media, payments, neural-to-digital interface technology and artificial intelligence. Don’t ignore this very specific choice of sectors. Ask instead what could go wrong when they are all controlled by a person willing to intervene heavily in national politics.

Sánchez wants the EU to do three things: require platforms to match every user account to an official ID (without losing public pseudonymity), open up their feed algorithms to check they aren’t breaking the law and hold executives personally accountable for breaches. This is the approach — using the law to stop harmful digital behaviour, once upon a time just called “governing” — that Europe pioneered with privacy legislation and its later big laws on digital markets, digital services and AI. It has abruptly fallen out of fashion.

Unfashionable does not mean misguided. As the legal scholar Anu Bradford points out in a recent article, Europe’s innovation lag has more to do with market fragmentation, lack of risk capital and rigid labour rules than with how it regulates the products themselves. That is why the European Commission’s belated embrace of a “28th regime” of easy-to-navigate corporate, bankruptcy and labour law for innovative businesses anywhere in the EU can be a game-changer, if done right. 

Of course, regulation can impose costs. But as important is that it influences the kind of technology that is developed. New Oxford university research shows that European privacy rules tilted AI research towards data-saving techniques and away from the data-intensive deep learning.

Until a few weeks ago, that would have looked like dooming Europe to lose the AI race. DeepSeek might have changed things. The bigger point is that there is not just one technology on offer. The same researchers suggest that European tech overcame the initial cost of privacy regulation precisely by evolving more privacy-compliant technologies.

But to achieve a digital economy to their liking, European leaders need to do two more things. First, brace themselves for the consequences as Big Tech plays tough. This can range from punitive action from the Trump administration to withdrawing services. But, as recently demonstrated by Brazil (with X) and indeed the US itself (with TikTok), governments can actually shut down social media without the sky falling in. The EU may want to prepare itself for life without some of the most problematic services, just in case.

Second, acquire the means to thrive without them. A forthcoming report led by Francesca Bria for Bertelsmann Stiftung is set to advocate a “EuroStack” — a comprehensive European alternative for all layers in the internet’s technological “stack”, from the raw materials and physical infrastructure to the cloud and software running the internet of things.

This requires fixing the shortcomings that hold back investments in European tech at the moment, as well as regulatory change. But, above all, it requires a consensus that another digital world is possible: not just a copy, but an alternative to the current “stack” run by oligarchs around a US president who does not wish Europe well.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

特朗普惩罚性关税迫近,印度立场坚定

在与华盛顿就俄罗斯石油采购陷入僵局之际,新德里向莫斯科抛出橄榄枝。

Lex专栏:预测市场——美国的新一轮豪赌

从体育比赛到诺贝尔和平奖,用户如今都能下注押宝其结果。

哈梅内伊排除与美国政府直接对话的可能

伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊态度强硬,指责美国意在迫使伊朗屈服,并称主张与美国直接谈判的伊朗政界人士“肤浅”。

私募股权集团KKR支持的音乐节因巴勒斯坦旗帜问题遭到抵制

多支乐队因主办方禁止现场展示巴勒斯坦旗帜而选择退出,主办方随后“诚挚道歉”。

汇丰瑞士私人银行清退部分中东客户

此前瑞士监管机构认定该行在反洗钱审查方面存在疏忽,禁止其接纳高风险客户。

决策者警告:富裕经济体将需要外籍劳工推动增长

央行人士称,全球最大经济体的低生育率正威胁生产率与物价。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×