EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction

The wheels have not come off the electronic vehicle market entirely

When periods of exuberance come to a close, ideas that once seemed to make a lot of sense no longer do. So it is in the European car industry. Slowing growth of electric vehicle sales has caused a series of corporate U-turns. While sharp swerves are never fun, the change in direction is sensible.

A decision by Volvo Cars on Thursday to cut loose its premium EV brand Polestar is the latest example of a strategic about-turn. Earlier this week, Renault axed plans to float its EV unit Ampere. A mooted initial public offering of Volkswagen’s battery unit, meanwhile, also looks some way off.

The wheels have not come off the EV market entirely. Sales growth in Europe is expected to come in at about 5 per cent in 2024 — a sharp slowdown from 2023’s 14 per cent growth, but hardly a crash. The market had simply overestimated the pace of change.

EU carmakers, traditionally plagued with vast conglomerate discounts, aimed to attract sky high valuations for their EV arms. The hope was to achieve those enjoyed by Tesla, which trades at more than 58 times forward earnings, and Vietnam’s VinFast. Now that the market’s enthusiasm has waned — shares in VinFast are down 85 per cent over the past six months — “unlocking value” through corporate action looks less attractive.   

The strategic rationale for EV listings was always tenuous. Polestar, with sizeable investment needs and operationally reliant on Volvo and its Chinese parent Geely, was not an obvious candidate for a standalone equity story when it listed in 2022. Worse, Volvo retained 48 per cent. With the Swedish carmaker facing big EV-related capex needs of its own, a spin-off that hands Polestar to its ultimate shareholder Geely looks like a better plan. Volvo’s stock rose by about a quarter on Thursday. 

At Renault, too, shareholders welcomed the decision to keep Ampere within the fold. Lex has argued that EVs will be a key pillar of the group’s value creation in future. But given Renault does not need capital to fund its transition, it is right to hold on to Ampere for the time being.

The slowing pace of EV adoption is good news for traditional European automakers, which have been slow to transition. Stellantis, which has taken a particularly cautious approach, has outperformed Tesla in the past 12 months. If the EV revolution takes longer to materialise legacy automakers should have more time to align themselves with their EV-focused peers.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

法律AI初创公司为律师开辟的另类职业路径

AI热潮正在为初级和资深律师开辟一条另类的职业路径:加入法律科技初创公司工作,且往往还能获得股权。

苹果、伯克希尔与耐心的美德

这两家公司等待绝佳机遇的耐心策略曾经奏效,但如今却愈发困难。

沃什应该倾听美联储的反对声音

在连续供应冲击下持续美联储宽松政策,是一种无视疫情教训的高风险做法。

Lex专栏:诺和诺德再迎问鼎减重药霸主地位的机会

减重药的第二波竞争已然打响,礼来和诺和诺德都已推出口服版本,而这一次,优势或许在诺和诺德这边。

FT社评:美国欠欧洲盟友一份防务路线图

美国的报复性削减开支无法实现合理的北约责任分担。

欧洲能否开发出欧洲版的“战斧”?

欧洲眼下推进的项目至少还要十年才能落地,但短期内并非没有权宜之计。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×