The AI job cuts are accelerating - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

The AI job cuts are accelerating

Companies are preparing for a time where there might be less work for their employees

Microsoft, by chief executive Satya Nadella’s own description, is “thriving”. Its quarterly profits soared by almost 25 per cent and its market valuation hit $4tn last week. In any normal situation, it would seem incongruent that the company is at the same time slashing its workforce by the thousands. 

The pursuit of a leaner workforce is not new. In times of economic uncertainty, companies prune excesses — cutting headcount and eliminating inefficiencies. But today it is not just about doing more with fewer people. Companies are preparing for a time where there might be less work for their employees altogether. 

Even as business leaders claim AI is “redesigning” jobs rather than cutting them, the headlines tell another story. It is not just Microsoft but Intel and BT that are among a host of major companies announcing thousands of lay-offs explicitly linked to AI. Previously when job cuts were announced, there was a sense that these were regrettable choices. Now executives consider them a sign of progress. Companies are pursuing greater profits with fewer people.  

For the tech industry, revenue per employee has become a prized performance metric. Y Combinator start-ups brag about building companies with skeleton teams. A website called the “Tiny Teams Hall of Fame” lists companies bringing in tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue with just a handful of employees.

OpenAI’s Sam Altman has gone further, predicting the eventual rise of a one-person $1bn company. That may still sound far-fetched — but it is undeniable large language models are already reshaping white-collar work. While new jobs are being created in the AI age and some workers redeployed, a lot of positions will be eliminated. Companies are increasingly saying the tasks of those workers no longer exist.

Already it’s clear the hiring of coders has dropped off a cliff. And almost daily, my inbox delivers examples of AI’s prowess versus humans. Among the latest is how one Big Four firm has slashed turnaround times for research by 75 per cent, reclaiming 3,600 analyst hours by using AI-generated reports. 

Younger workers should be particularly concerned about this trend. Entire rungs on the career ladder are taking a hit, undermining traditional job pathways. This is not only about AI of course. Offshoring, post-Covid budget discipline, and years of underwhelming growth have made entry-level hiring an easy thing to cut. But AI is adding to pressures.

Dirk Hahn, chief executive of recruiter Hays, said to me: “While there will be exceptions, the rise of AI could constrain the recovery in some junior white-collar roles.” If the footholds are eroding, where does that leave future workers? What shape do organisations take if there are fewer starter jobs and middle management positions? Professional development and leadership pipelines need to be redefined. 

The consequences are cultural as well as economic. If jobs aren’t readily available, will a university degree retain its value? Careers already are increasingly “squiggly” and not linear. The rise of freelancing and hiring of contractors has already fragmented the nature of work in many cases. AI will only propel this. 

But are leaner organisations necessarily better ones? I am not convinced these companies are more resilient even if they perform better financially. Faster decision making and lower overheads are great, but does this mean fewer resources for R&D, legal functions or compliance? What about a company’s ability to withstand shocks — from supply chain disruptions to employee turnover and dare I say it, runaway robots?

Some companies such as Klarna have reversed tack, realising that firing hundreds of staff and relying on AI resulted in a poorer customer service experience. Now the payments company wants them back.

The tech bros touting people-light companies underestimate the complexity of business operations and corporate cultures that are built on very human relationships and interactions. In fact, while AI can indeed handle the tedium, there should be a new premium on the human — from creativity and emotional intelligence to complex judgment. But that can only happen if we invest in those who bring those qualities and teach the next generation of workers — and right now, the door is closing on many of them.

anjli.raval@ft.com

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

相关话题

乌克兰无人机袭击致索契俄罗斯油库起火

弗拉基米尔•泽连斯基对黑海设施遭远程打击表示欢迎,目前无人机和导弹的交火仍在持续。

我们不能把全球贸易的所有混乱都归咎于特朗普

世界贸易组织的许多体制和程序已经失灵,我们应当承认这一失败。

欧佩克+将石油产量配额上调至两年来最高水平

分析师预测,在该卡特尔取消减产后,原油将在今年年底前出现供应过剩。

中国出口会继续无视特朗普的贸易战吗?

我们可以预期英格兰银行利率制定者会释放哪些信号?美股还能继续上涨吗?

星巴克在曼哈顿对决中国的瑞幸咖啡

美国连锁店通过升级门店,并为顾客提供不同的服务方式,以提振销售。

澳大利亚偏远港口卷入美中安全博弈

澳大利亚总理安东尼•阿尔巴内塞因安全担忧誓言要收回达尔文港的控制权。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×