Lunar property rights: buy me to the moon - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Lunar property rights: buy me to the moon

If you can buy a home in the metaverse, why not on the moon?

If you can buy a home in the metaverse, why not on the moon? The heavenly body has already hosted visitors, played a key role in earthly geopolitics and may be home to untold mineral treasures. Traffic jams, collisions and debris all point to outer space facing some of the issues that bedevil planet earth. High time, reckons the neoliberal Adam Smith Institute, to consider privatisation.

This is a long shot, to put it mildly. As things stand, the moon — like other celestial bodies — cannot be appropriated by any sovereign or militia, under the Outer Space Treaty it is the “province of all mankind”. Changing that would require international consensus and a mindset shift rather too grand for a world struggling with earthly borders and reappraising globalisation.

Virtually every country has lunar ambitions but the big muscle comes from the US, Russia and China, an uneasy set of bedfellows at the best of times. Increasingly, space is in the sights of individuals who have amassed earthly wealth: Elon Musk, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Virgin founder Richard Branson, among others. That illustrates the shift in motivations, from national pride to financial incentives. The global space economy was worth an estimated £270bn in 2019 and is projected to almost double to £490bn by the end of this decade.

There would be losers too from a carve-up that allotted parcels to the modern equivalent of 16th century colonisers. Imagine a sovereign controlling not just a gas pipeline but entire communications. The UK has estimated that blocked access to global navigation satellite systems for just five days could cost the country £5.2bn. Consider too that the triumvirate of countries leading the way have vastly different ideas about both property and human rights.

Rebecca Lowe, the author of the paper, proposes getting round this with temporary and conditional ownership of plots. Owners, more akin to long term renters, could not hand their plots down from generation to generation.

Because rent cannot be paid to the man in the moon, a philanthropic fund would take the money and redistribute it into areas of common good such as conservation, say, or scientific endeavours.

Plenty of critics see this as about as likely as chunks of moon going on sale at the local fromagerie. But precisely because humanity has made such a hash of carving up the earth, it is a worthwhile debate to start.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

英数据中心初创企业Nscale与微软达成140亿美元合作协议

这家获英伟达投资的AI云计算集团拿下巨额新合同,其首席执行官称正考虑在“明年下半年”上市。

OpenAI制定五年商业计划以兑现万亿美元支出承诺

OpenAI正在拓展新的营收渠道、建立债务合作关系并进一步融资,以覆盖巨额支出。

FT社评:欧洲需要更完善的芯片战略

荷兰接管安世半导体一事,暴露出欧盟如何深深陷入了美中芯片大战。

英国《金融时报》2025年EMBA排名显示毕业生收入上升

华盛顿大学-复旦项目位居榜首,而其他商科学位校友薪资下滑或持平。

你非得嚼那么响吗?饱受厌声症折磨的种种困境

鲜为人知的医疗疾病背后,正在浮现的奇异科学。

乌克兰在美国协助下打击俄罗斯能源设施

自今夏以来,特朗普政府一直支持基辅的行动,并协调推进削弱莫斯科的努力。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×