Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson

From Rowan Hill, Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

Like a lot of people, I’ve been dabbling with OpenAI’s ChatGPT with varying seriousness for about 12 months.

“Make me a 12-week marathon training plan”, “Create me a six-week marathon training plan”, “Make a photo of me as the next Pope”, “Is it possible to run a marathon without any training?”

When the platform went kaput this month, I was midway through writing an application for a voluntary role with an academic magazine. I’ve scoffed at accounts of students using artificial intelligence to get through college, deriding them for only cheating themselves. In my own much superior and honest scholarly pursuits, I only ever used it to source articles . . . or plan . . . and sometimes reference . . . or clean up those long sentences that don’t really go anywhere, nor make the point you want to make, but roll on and on for far too long, eating up word count.

As a result of the blackout, however, I ended up with two very different halves of an application. The first, produced with ChatGPT’s help, sounded like something I’d written, if you ignored a few of the more exotic word choices and overlooked the box-ticking style of the answers. It did everything the question had asked of it, and it wasn’t necessarily a fabrication.

The second wasn’t as polished. Pulitzer-worthy accounts of my leadership and prowess in adversity made way for honest accounts of my achievements. Sentences were clipped and to the point. At the end, I realised there were a few ideas that I’d missed but just couldn’t shoehorn them in. But it was definitely me talking about me.

An obsession with performance is continuously being maximised, from schools to the workplace to public services. But at what cost? Tim Harford’s Undercover Economist column “Shared values over profit” (Spectrum, June 7) and his account of Alasdair MacIntyre’s “tale of two fishing crews”, illustrated the perils of this fascination excellently. The first crew is driven by nothing but profit. The second allows time for the cultivation of character and human connection within the team, yet often comes out on top.

ChatGPT’s outage opened my own eyes to how I’d sleepwalked, slowly but surely, into believing maximum utility was somehow better than sticking to my values. This dilemma isn’t just an issue for business; it’s a challenge for individuals too.

Rowan Hill

Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

印度炼油商从委内瑞拉事件中看到机遇

美国政府干预以推翻马杜罗并控制委内瑞拉能源资源的举动,为印度炼油商重新获得委内瑞拉石油打开了大门。

一周展望:通胀数据会否打乱美联储降息计划?

本周的数据还可能证明中国的贸易顺差将创下新高,这将引起中国与美国以外国家的紧张。

投资额达10亿美元的沙特主题乐园开幕

在多项宏大基建计划屡遭挫折之后,奇迪亚六旗乐园的落成令该国统治者倍感振奋。

北欧国家驳斥特朗普关于中俄舰船出现在格陵兰周边的说法

随着特朗普关于夺取格陵兰的言论日益强硬,他把这些舰船当作论据提出。

伊朗警告美国政府不要干预

内乱构成伊斯兰共和国多年来面临的最大威胁。

特朗普对美国国防工业的攻击令投资者不安

总统要求限制股东回报和薪酬,同时也提出军费开支大幅增长的前景。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×