Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

谷歌的卡武克丘奥卢:将抽象的AI思维转化为用户友好的产品

这家科技巨头的首席AI架构师兼DeepMind首席技术官讨论了Gemini 3大型语言模型以及向通用人工智能目标迈进的最新进展。

美国石油巨头埃克森美孚告诉特朗普:委内瑞拉“无法投资”

首席执行官达伦•伍兹反击总统要求仓促重返这个动荡国家的呼吁。
2小时前

英伟达在中国的前景与亚洲的数据中心融资

黄仁勋表示,H200在市场上很有竞争力。但它不会一直保持竞争力。

东南亚在关税战中的韧性出乎意料

东盟国家应借助其韧性推进国内改革和贸易改革。

通用汽车披露因电动车转型与中国业务重组造成70亿美元冲击

总部位于底特律的汽车制造商称其“主动下调了电动车产能”。

中国AI芯片“三小龙”的真实火力如何?

三家新近上市的半导体制造商均处于亏损状态,且其销售额都不到最大竞争对手的十分之一。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×