Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

尽管关税施压,美国“三大”汽车制造商前景改善

福特汽车、通用汽车和斯泰兰蒂斯迅速采取行动以抵消贸易战的影响,并从纾困措施中受益。
19小时前

俄罗斯为苏联时代“傻瓜炸弹”加装喷气发动机

俄军的滑翔炸弹如今可打击最远200公里外的乌克兰目标。
21小时前

日本正适应与美国关系的新局面

曾经以利他主义和合作为基础的伙伴关系,如今已演变为交易型伙伴关系。

亚洲股市对AI热潮的依赖引发“泡沫”担忧

一些投资者日益担心,亚洲股市可能受到美国科技板块大幅下调的冲击。

日本便利店的阴暗面

工资上涨与劳动力老龄化给现有员工带来压力,这一体系正不堪重负。

Lex专栏:金佰利收购Kenvue的交易恐引发“偏头痛”

在正常时期,这笔对感冒药泰诺制造商的收购看起来会是一招明智之举,但现在可不是正常时期。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×