Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

莫迪希望夺取苹果印度生产基地的掌控权

泰米尔纳德邦已成为制造业强省,但莫迪领导的印度人民党迄今难以在这片土地上取得进展。

Lex专栏:标普500指数回升,但战争阴云仍笼罩股市

增长预期上升却未带动估值攀升,说明投资者对未来更加谨慎。

伊朗战争推高化肥成本,美国农民雪上加霜

美国农业部门本已因特朗普贸易战而深受打击,这场冲突又推高了化肥成本。

宾州芯片制造业振兴计划在特朗普任内陷入停滞

高科技半导体制造业发端于利哈伊山谷,但承诺用于其复兴的联邦资金迟迟未能到位。

苹果下一任掌门人特努斯面临决定性的AI时刻

库克的继任者必须带领这家iPhone制造商渡过产业转型。

乌克兰无人机飞行员在500公里外打击俄罗斯目标

基于互联网的新型引导系统使乌克兰无人机操作员能够在远离战场的区域执行任务。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×