Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

詹姆斯•古恩:好莱坞的票房超级英雄

他是垃圾邪典电影的粉丝,他的古怪大片将漫画系列从致命危险中解救出来。

特朗普称将自8月1日起对欧盟和墨西哥征收30%的关税

美国总统在社交媒体上发布致贸易伙伴的信件,发出新的威胁。

大型制药公司面临迫在眉睫的“专利悬崖”

当重磅药物失去知识产权保护时,公司的收入可能会因此损失数十亿美元。

敖德萨爱乐乐团如何在战火中坚持演奏

一支乌克兰乐团和他们的美国指挥在俄罗斯导弹的威胁下坚守,为这座城市带来了音乐。

我在股市中吃下的‘谦卑之饼’的感悟

在关税引发的抛售后逢低买入的散户投资者表现不错,但美国股市的前景依然充满挑战。

地缘经济学的新时代

唐纳德•特朗普的关税威胁只是更广泛转变的一部分。吉莲•邰蒂解释了为何商业正被国家治理所主导——以及我们应如何适应。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×