SoftBank: pay cuts do not offset investment flops - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

SoftBank: pay cuts do not offset investment flops

Founder Masayoshi Son has promised to play defence, slowing the pace of new investments and preserving cash

Founder Masayoshi Son is trying to turn round the fortunes of SoftBank following a historic loss for its Vision Fund unit. But moves to counteract falling profits and a dwindling share price are too little, too late. They include steep pay cuts for executives of the Japanese tech investment group.

The surprisingly steep reductions follow a record investment loss of ¥3.5tn ($27.5bn) at the Vision Fund unit for the year to March. Oddly, Son’s pay was unchanged at Y100mn ($785,000). Executives who suffered pay package shrinkage included chief financial officer Yoshimitsu Goto. His remuneration dropped 40 per cent compared with the previous year

SoftBank has a history of largesse. Simon Segars, the former chief executive of the company’s chip unit Arm, earned $9mn during the three months that he was a board director. Former chief operating officer Marcelo Claure, who left SoftBank earlier this year after months of frosty negotiations over pay, earned more than $14mn in the year before his departure. That put him on a par with former chief operating officer of Bank of America Thomas Montag.

SoftBank blamed the record loss at its first Vision Fund in the year to March on the tech sell-off in the US and China. But some prominent companies in which SoftBank is the largest shareholder have performed far worse than the market. Shares in South Korean ecommerce platform Coupang have plunged 72 per cent since it listed. The stock of Didi, a Chinese ride-hailing group, has fallen 75 per cent in the past year.

Such reversals call into question the strategy of SoftBank executives including Rajeev Misra, chief executive of SoftBank Investment Advisers, which oversees the firm’s Vision Funds.

SoftBank shares have halved since their 2021 peak. They trade below book value at less than half the group’s stated net asset value of $150bn.

Son has promised to play defence, slowing the pace of new investments and preserving cash. The question for investors should be whether it is worth holding shares in a business that is still paying executives highly to underperform the market.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Thrive Capital:多样化是给那些不知道自己在做什么的人准备的

乔什•库什纳旗下的这家年轻的风投公司以大手笔投资OpenAI而闻名,颠覆了传统的风险投资模式。它能得到真正的收益吗?

谁要买Chrome?

关于储蓄的思考。

将谷歌和Chrome浏览器分开是好办法吗?

呼吁这家搜索巨头剥离Chrome浏览器,会给用户带来他们显然不想要的东西。

高增长并不能说明美国经济的全貌

令人印象深刻的头条数字对民主党没有帮助。

没有学位也没问题:美国雇主不再局限于大学文凭

IBM、通用汽车和沃尔玛等公司正专注于申请人的技能,而不是教育。

阿达尼丑闻将动摇印度股市替代中国的努力

就在几个月前,印度股票被视为全球投资者投资组合中中国股票的可行替代,但此次事件使人们重新关注当地股票的风险和高昂估值。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×