Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Lego’s corporate model is key to its brick-by-brick success

The Danish company has benefitted from being built on a long-term perspective

Many one-product companies run out of road. Small plastic bricks have supported Denmark’s Lego for more than 70 years. A clear focus can pay off. But, amid a debate over the health of public markets, its success also demonstrates the benefits of its distinctive corporate structure.

The toymaker’s sales growth of 2 per cent last year was dragged down by a weak performance in China. But it was respectable enough given a seven per cent decline in toy industry sales. Lego’s sales are not much less than the combined total of its quoted US rivals Mattel and Hasbro. 

Inflation, one cause of the industry’s woes, is subsiding. Low birth rates, another problem, will persist. That is partly offset by adult fans of Lego. This group — known as Afols — creates a market for costly, complicated kits like the Titanic or Eiffel Tower. This “Icons” line made some of the biggest gains of any toy property globally in 2023, according to Circana. 

New products accounted for roughly half of Lego’s portfolio last year. Innovation isn’t without risk: novelty can damage profitability if it means fewer universal pieces that can be produced in high volumes for lots of different kits. The proliferation of parts contributed to Lego’s downturn in 2003, says academic David Robertson. However, the business has since expanded so it can use more parts without hurting the ratio of sales to profits.   

Lego’s operating profit margin fell by 1.7 per cent to 26 per cent, as it spent more on stores, its supply chain and digital operations. Even so, that is nearly three times Hasbro’s adjusted operating figure. Were it quoted, Lego would be worth much more than the $43bn estimate arrived at by using Hasbro’s trailing EV-to-ebitda ratio of 15.5 times.

But Lego is privately held and there is no sign of that changing. Kirkbi, an investment vehicle run by the founding family, owns 75 per cent, with the remainder owned by the Lego Foundation. When an heir opted to sell some Kirkbi shares for $930mn last year, family members took up the slack. Outside investors’ only exposure to the brand is through Legoland-owner Merlin Entertainments. Blackstone and Canadian pension fund CPPIB teamed up with Kirkbi on the £6bn take-private bid in 2019. 

External investors might have been less inclined to tolerate last year’s 10 per cent dividend cut to fund investment. There is evidence that tightly held companies like Lego benefit from a long-term perspective. Building the business, like its product, is an exercise in patience. It can yield impressive results.

vanessa.houlder@ft.com

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

顶级咨询公司冻结毕业生起薪,AI冲击传统“金字塔”模式

科技带来的生产率提升正引发一场争论:咨询行业是否还需要依赖庞大的初级顾问队伍。

埃森哲将80万员工定义为“重塑者”以适应AI时代

此举追随迪士尼的“幻想工程师”和亚马逊的“忍者程序员”的脚步。

企业申请欧盟创新基金或需要3000小时文书工作

欧盟创新基金自成立以来虽批准了71亿欧元拨款,但因繁琐的审批程序,实际支付给企业的资金仅有4.7%。

“全面危机”来临:美国医疗成本将大幅上升

在可负担性问题不断加剧之际,美国医保保费飙升酿成的危机正在逼近,西弗吉尼亚州正处在这场灾难的震中。

一周展望:美国通胀的粘性有多大?

《市场前瞻》是英国《金融时报》对下周动向的指南。

Lex专栏:混动汽车的畅销将支撑铂价继续上行

纯电动汽车在美欧的普及放缓,对使用铂的催化转换器的需求仍将持续。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×